| Participant(s):
|
Forfatter:
Spada, G.
Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Fondamenti, Urbino University
DTU Space
Email:
Forfatter:
Klemann, V.
Earth System Modelling, GFZ
Forfatter:
Van der Wal, W.
TU Delft
Forfatter:
James, T. S.
Geologocal Survey of Canada
Forfatter:
Simon, K.
Geologocal Survey of Canada
Forfatter:
Riva, R. E. M.
TU Delft
Forfatter:
Martinec, Z.
Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
Forfatter:
Gasperini, P.
Settore Geofisica, Università di Bologna
Forfatter:
Lund, B.
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University
Forfatter:
Wolf, D.
Earth System Modelling, GFZ
Forfatter:
Vermeersen, L. L. A.
TU Delft
Forfatter:
King, M. A.
School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University
|
| Abstract:
|
The study of the process of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) and of the consequent sea level varia-tions is gaining an increasingly important role within the geophysical community. Understanding the response of the Earth to the waxing and waning ice sheets is crucial in various contexts, ranging from the interpretation of modern satellite geodetic measurements to the projections of future sea level trends in response to climate change. All the processes accompanying GIA can be described solving the so-called Sea Level Equation (SLE), an integral equation that accounts for the interactions be-tween the ice sheets, the solid Earth, and the oceans. Modern approaches to the SLE are based on various techniques that range from purely analytical formulations to fully numerical methods. Despite various teams independently investigating GIA, we do not have a suitably large set of agreed numeri-cal results through which the methods may be validated. Following the example of the mantle con-vection community and our recent successful Benchmark for Post Glacial Rebound codes (Spada et al., 2011), here we present the results of a benchmark study of independently developed codes de-signed to solve the SLE. This study has taken place within a collaboration facilitated through the Eu-ropean Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ES0701. The tests involve predictions of past and current sea level variations, and 3D deformations of the Earth surface. In spite of the significant differences in the numerical methods employed, the test computations performed so far show a satisfactory agreement between the results provided by the participants. The differences found, which can be often attributed to the different numerical algorithms employed within the com-munity, help to constrain the intrinsic errors in model predictions. These are of fundamental im-portance for a correct interpretation of the geodetic variations observed today, and particularly for the evaluation of climate-driven sea level variations. |